Craigslist Case

Thursday, Dec. 04, 2008 - 9:43 a.m.

John has today and tomorrow off.

It's identical to the length of the Thanksgiving weekend except this time he's not compelled to take care of his thoughtful and beautiful wife who couldn't wash her hair or use a knife and fork, or pick her nose last week.

However, it's not a completely kickback set of days, as John got up early today and took the car in to get the ignition cylinder fixed.

I presume of course that kickbackness begins when he returns home.

---

I am currently listening to the Ronn Owens program on KGO -- with avid interest. He's talking about the Craigslist case:

FORT COLLINS, Colo. (AP) � A man accused of making unflattering online comments about his former lover and her attorney on Craigslist has been charged with two counts of criminal libel. "It's not a charge you see a lot of," Larimer County District Attorney Larry Abrahamson said of the 1800s-era state law that can put people in jail for the content of their speech or writing.

Abrahamson charged J.P. Weichel, 40, of Loveland, in October over posts he allegedly made on Craigslist's "Rants and Rave" section.

The case began when a woman told Loveland police in December 2007 about postings made about her between November and December 2007. Court records show posts that suggested she traded sexual acts for legal services from her attorney and mentioned a visit from child services because of an injury to her child. Police obtained search warrants for records from Web sites including Craigslist before identifying Weichel as the suspect. Weichel shares a child with the woman.

Weichel, confronted by detectives at his workplace in August, said he was "just venting," according to court records. No phone listing could be found for Weichel, and his attorney, Michael Liggett of Fort Collins, didn't immediately return a message left Monday by The Associated Press.

Libel is commonly seen as a civil case. Denver attorney Steve Zansberg, who specializes in First Amendment law, said prosecutors seeking criminal libel cases could have a "chilling" effect on free speech in Colorado, particularly over the Internet. Abrahamson wasn't so sure. He said it is up to police departments to pursue cases. Zansberg contends the law is outdated, is unclear about stating opinions and is written in such a way that dead people could be victims of criminal libel.

The statute allows prosecution for speech "tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead" or to "expose the natural defects of one who is alive, and thereby to expose him to public hatred, contempt or ridicule." Criminal libel carries a punishment of up to 18 months in prison.

I emailed Ronn the following:

I am very glad to hear about the Craigslist issue, for very personal reasons:

Five years ago, I was defrauded and harassed by an internet predator. After I discovered his ruse, absolutely no resource I tried to use would do anything to stop him, and to this day he is still at large and still harming people.

Until recently, there's been literally *no* enforcement of existing laws and terms of service, and despite the fact that I'll probably never see my perpetrator do any time, I am still relieved to see that some case history is finally being developed.

One of these days, the person who worked me over is going to mess with the wrong person. Maybe it won't be me, but I hope the playground in which these predators thrive is finally going to be bulldozed.

---

Okay, that's it! Have a good Thursday.

---

what you missed - what's next - leave a note
first post - cast page - diaryrings - top ten

THE LEGAL STUFF: All content on this site that was created by me is copyright 2003-infinity by Brin Marie McLaughlin. Steal my stuff and I'll squash you like a bug. All incoming email or any other form of communication with me is subject to publication or other distribution by me in whole or in part at my sole discretion. This diary features the sole opinions and experiences of one person, namely me, the person who is paying for this space. In the interest of safety and accountability, no anonymous input will ever be allowed here, ever, for any reason in the entire history of ever. Whenever there is a comments section appearing in this diary, it's to be considered part of my paid presence on the web, and shall be used by my readership to supplement the things I have written here with relevant information in a polite manner. Comments that do not fall in that category are subject to deletion at my whim. Your visit to my diary along with your use of my comments section constitutes the understanding of this statement. Anything else on these pages including any comments belongs to whoever created it. All external links are current as of the date of the entry in which they are first featured, but at no other time. News excerpts used here are for educational purposes and are permitted under the Fair Use Doctrine. Hold hands when you cross the street, and play nice.